VOLOVLOAutomation risk & transition, task by task
AskOccupationsMajorsBusinessFoundersChangesNotesMethod
Search occupations, majors…
EN
  • English
  • 简体中文
  • 日本語
  • Español
  • Português
  • Français
VLO
VOLO

Understanding how automation changes work — task by task, with the evidence shown and the uncertainty admitted.

AskOccupationsMajorsBusinessFoundersChangesNotesMethodWill AI replace my job?AboutRole diagnosisOpen dataOntologyVOLO ProPrivacyTerms
© 2026 VOLO
Guides
Ask VOLOFor businessFor foundersRecent changesNotesRole diagnosisFirst AI experimentVOLO ProMethod & evidenceAboutFollow an occupationSearch
Occupations
All occupations
AI / software
Translator / InterpreterBank tellerCopywriterContent moderatorCustomer service representativeAdministrative assistantSoftware tester / QA engineerGraphic designerParalegalVideo editorAccountant / BookkeeperMarketing specialistFrontend developerTax preparer / tax agentVoice actorMedical coderData analystInsurance claims handlerTechnical writer / documentation engineerJunior software developerInsurance underwriterHR / recruiterLoan officer / credit officerFinancial analystProcurement / supply chain specialistJournalistSales / account managerReal estate agentIT support specialist / helpdeskAuditorManagement consultantBackend developerAI researcherProduct / UX designerBusiness systems ownerE-commerce operations specialistActuaryRadiologistData engineerProject managerLawyerMedical assistant / clinic assistantQuantity surveyorMachine learning engineerExperienced software engineerDevOps / platform / SRE engineerProduct managerPharmacistPartnerships / channel managerSecurity analyst (SOC)Financial adviser / financial plannerCompliance officerLibrarianArchitectFirst-line manager / team supervisorCounsellor / therapistRetail salesperson / shop assistantCivil / structural engineerSecurity guardBus driverInsurance agentSchool teacherGeneral practitioner / primary care doctorAirline pilotWaiter / restaurant serverRadiographer / radiologic technologistAuto mechanic / vehicle technicianPolice officerSonographerAir traffic controllerVeterinarianPhysiotherapist / rehabilitation therapistDentistConstruction workerSocial workerRegistered nurseCare worker / nursing assistantPlumberAI implementation lead
RPA / self-service
Government service clerkOperations coordinatorMetro train driverReceptionist / front desk
Robotics
Retail cashier / shop assistantContainer port workerWarehouse workerAssembly line workerMedical laboratory technicianWelderChef / cookCleaner / janitorFarmerFirefighterCabin crewElectrician
Autonomous driving
Ride-hail / taxi driverTruck driverDelivery rider / courier
Majors
All majorsEnglish / Foreign languagesComputer scienceAccountingPsychologyJournalism / CommunicationFinanceLawVisual communication designMarketingNursingBusiness administrationEducation and teacher trainingArchitecturePublic administrationMedicineHospitality and tourism managementEconomicsInformation systems
Enter as:I have a jobI am studyingI run a companyI am building something
Recent changes›Security analyst (SOC)›2025-09-11
ConstraintCognitive automation2025-09-11

China's cyberspace regulator requires network operators to grade incidents themselves against a national scale and report within hours, and makes outsourced security providers report to them

Security analyst (SOC)occupation page →
Event date / reported
2025-09-11 · reported 2025-09-15
Evidence stage
ConstraintFailure, rollback, regulation or cost is suppressing adoption. Can lower an assessment or widen its uncertainty.
Tasks this bears on
Deciding it is an incident
Calling it: waking people up, pulling a system off the network, telling the business it has a problem — on incomplete information and before you can be sure.
Still human-led✓ Evidence-backed
Where this applies
A national rule for every network operator in China. Article 4 requires an operator that discovers or learns of an incident to assess it against the attached grading guide and, for incidents graded significant or above, report within one hour for critical information infrastructure, two hours for central government bodies and four hours for others. Article 5 requires operators to make providers of security and operations services report the incidents they detect to the operator and help it report. Article 10 provides heavier penalties for the operator and the responsible persons where late, missed, false or concealed reports cause serious harm. It puts the determination and the accountability on the operator; it does not say whether a person or a system does the grading.
What this means
China's rule does not let an operator hand the incident call to whoever watches its network: the provider reports to the operator, the operator grades it, and the operator's responsible people answer for a wrong or late call. Deciding it is an incident is an accountable act, and the rules keep it that way.
What it does not yet show
It assigns the judgement to the operator, not to a person; nothing here shows who inside the operator grades incidents, or whether software does it.
What you can check
Open the CAC's 《国家网络安全事件报告管理办法》 and find 「应当按照《网络安全事件分级指南》(见附件)进行研判」.
Does it change the assessment?
No. The impact index is never moved by a single event. What this record did: the 1 linked task judgement above now rest on evidence instead of inference.
Source
国家互联网信息办公室 (Cyberspace Administration of China) — 《国家网络安全事件报告管理办法》, dated 11 September 2025, in force 1 November 2025 · verified 2026-09-28 · Claude (VOLO agent) · interpreted 2026-09-28 · Claude (VOLO agent)
Primary source — published by the party that did this, or the authority of record. No co-signature needed.
All changes for Security analyst (SOC) →All recent changes →How events become evidence →