VOLOVLOAutomation risk & transition, task by task
AskOccupationsMajorsBusinessFoundersChangesNotesMethod
Search occupations, majors…For agents
EN
  • English
  • 简体中文
  • 日本語
  • Español
  • Português
  • Français
VLO
VOLO

Understanding how automation changes work — task by task, with the evidence shown and the uncertainty admitted.

AskOccupationsMajorsBusinessFoundersChangesNotesMethodWill AI replace my job?AboutRole diagnosisOpen dataOntologyFor agentsVOLO ProPrivacyTerms
© 2026 VOLO
Occupations
All occupations
AI / software
Translator / InterpreterBank tellerCopywriterContent moderatorCustomer service representativeAdministrative assistantSoftware tester / QA engineerData entry clerkGraphic designerParalegalVideo editorAccountant / BookkeeperMarketing specialistFrontend developerTax preparer / tax agentVoice actorMedical coderData analystInsurance claims handlerTechnical writer / documentation engineerJunior software developerInsurance underwriterHR / recruiterLoan officer / credit officerFinancial analystProcurement / supply chain specialistJournalistSales / account managerReal estate agentNetwork engineerIllustratorTravel agent / travel advisorIT support specialist / helpdeskAuditorSupply chain plannerManagement consultantPhotographerBackend developerAI researcherProduct / UX designerBusiness systems ownerE-commerce operations specialistActuaryAnimator and VFX artistWriter and authorPayroll specialist / payroll clerkRadiologistData engineerProject managerData scientistCourt reporterEditor and proofreaderLawyerMedical assistant / clinic assistantQuantity surveyorContent creatorQuantitative analystMachine learning engineerExperienced software engineerDevOps engineer / platform engineer / SREBusiness analystMusician and composerGIS analyst / cartographerProperty appraiser / valuerProperty managerProduct managerDietitian / nutritionistEconomistPharmacistPartnerships / channel managerSecurity analyst (SOC)Financial adviser / financial plannerInterpreterPathologistChip design engineerGrant writer / grants officerCompliance officerLibrarianDrafter / CAD technicianArchitectFirst-line manager / team supervisorCounsellor / psychotherapistRetail salesperson / shop assistantCivil / structural engineerElectrical engineerIndustrial engineerStatisticianSecurity guardInterior designerUniversity lecturerPsychologistBus driverInsurance agentMechanical engineerFashion designerOptometristNotarySchool teacherGeneral practitioner / primary care doctorAirline pilotDriving instructorUrban plannerEmergency dispatcherWaiter / restaurant serverRadiographer / radiologic technologistLand surveyorAuto mechanic / vehicle technicianPolice officerSonographerAircraft maintenance technicianDental hygienistAnaesthesiologist / anaesthetistBuilding inspectorSpeech-language pathologist / speech and language therapistNurse practitionerAir traffic controllerVeterinarianBartender / baristaPhysiotherapist / rehabilitation therapistDentistSurgeonParamedic / EMTConstruction workerSocial workerJudge / magistrateRegistered nurseMassage therapistMidwifeCare worker / nursing assistantPlumberAI implementation lead
RPA / self-service
Government service clerkOperations coordinatorMetro train driverReceptionist / front deskPharmacy technicianPhlebotomistDental assistant / dental nurseRespiratory therapistOccupational therapist
Robotics
Retail cashier / shop assistantContainer port workerWarehouse workerAssembly line workerMedical laboratory technicianActor and modelMachinist / CNC machinistWelderChef / cookGardener / landscaperCleaner / janitorFarmerFirefighterHVAC technicianBricklayer / blocklayerCarpenter / joinerCabin crewHairdresser / barberElectrician
Autonomous driving
Ride-hail / taxi driverTruck driverDelivery rider / courier
Majors
All majorsEnglish / Foreign languagesComputer scienceAccountingPsychologyJournalism / CommunicationFinanceLawVisual communication designMarketingNursingBusiness administrationEducation and teacher trainingArchitecturePublic administrationMedicineHospitality and tourism managementEconomicsInformation systems
Guides
Ask VOLOFor businessFor foundersRecent changesNotesFor institutionsVOLO ProMethod & evidenceAboutFollow an occupationSearch
You are reading as:I have a jobI am studyingI run a companyI am building something
On this pageWhat is happeningTask breakdownRecent changesFor youWhat it means for youWhat you can doHow we knowWhat these rest on
Occupations›Journalist

Get told when a verified record lands on this occupation → · Mark which of these tasks are yours (VOLO Pro, free) → · For a team or a graduating class →

Journalist

Finds out what happened from people who would rather not say, and publishes it under a name that can be held to account.

News mediaAssessed 2026-09-10
Tasks automating
1of 5
2 being augmented
Still human-led
1of 5
1 new task
Evidence-backed judgements
5of 5
6 verified records
Test this week · first of 3 directions

List the people who would take your call today and tell you something not yet public. That number, more than your clippings, is your position in the profession.

See all 3 ↓
58/100
Automation impact indexMedium confidence

This is not a probability of losing your job. It combines how much of the role's task load is exposed to automation with how far adoption has actually gone — useful for comparing occupations on one consistent basis, and for nothing else.

Where this applies

Written for reporters and editors at news organisations and digital outlets. Broadcast presenting, photojournalism and wire-service commodity reporting face distinct pressures; the economic pressure on the industry predates and exceeds the technological one.

What is happening

What is actually changing#

The unit of analysis is the task, not the job title. A role is not replaced — its task mix shifts.

AutomatingBeing augmentedStill human-ledNew taskStriped: our inference, not yet backed by a verified record

Each tile is one task. Its size is how much of the job it is; its colour is where the task is heading. Click a tile to see what the judgement does not establish.

Significant task
Rewriting press releases and results
Automating✓ Evidence-backed
What this does NOT mean

This was often what junior reporters did while learning the beat. Removing it removes a training ground, not just a cost.

Read this task in full →Test AI on this task in your free workspace →
Core task
Getting people to tell you things
Still human-led✓ Evidence-backed
What this does NOT mean

Relationships protect the reporter who already has them. They do nothing for the entry-level jobs where those relationships used to be built, and those are the jobs the industry cut first.

Read this task in full →
Core task
Verifying claims and material
Being augmented✓ Evidence-backed
What this does NOT mean

More verification work is not more verification jobs. It typically lands on the same reporters as an added step, and newsrooms that cannot fund a verification desk simply publish with less checking.

Read this task in full →Test AI on this task in your free workspace →
Core task
Writing the piece
Being augmented✓ Evidence-backed
What this does NOT mean

Editorial judgement sits with a shrinking number of senior people. Assistance speeds the writing of a piece without changing how many pieces an outlet can fund.

Read this task in full →Test AI on this task in your free workspace →
Significant task
Detecting synthetic and manipulated media
New task✓ Evidence-backed
What this does NOT mean

Specialist desks exist at large outlets and essentially nowhere else. For most journalists this is a skill that makes them more employable, not a job that exists to be applied for.

Read this task in full →

Is this your job? Say so and this page narrows to your share of it.

A job title is a bundle of tasks bought together, and no two people hold the same bundle. Nothing is sent anywhere — it stays in this browser.

Rewriting press releases and resultsAutomating✓ Evidence-backedGetting people to tell you thingsStill human-led✓ Evidence-backedVerifying claims and materialBeing augmented✓ Evidence-backedWriting the pieceBeing augmented✓ Evidence-backedDetecting synthetic and manipulated mediaNew task✓ Evidence-backed

Read all 5 tasks in full — direction, reasoning and limits →

Recent changes#

2023202420252026today2023-05-22 · Labour impactThe BBC brought about 60 journalists into a forensic verification unit, citing manipulated video and AI-driven disinformation2023-08-15 · ConstraintThe Associated Press treats generative AI output as unvetted source material and requires its journalists to apply its sourcing standards2025-05-07 · ConstraintWIRED published and then retracted a freelance story that turned out to be an AI fabrication; two AI detectors had judged it human-written2025-05-18 · ConstraintThe Chicago Sun-Times and Philadelphia Inquirer printed a syndicated summer reading list with books that do not exist; the paper said the freelancer used an AI tool and the section was not reviewed2025-07-22 · DeploymentPew found Google users clicked a search result in 8% of visits when an AI summary appeared, against 15% when it did not, and clicked a link inside the summary in 1%2026-05-22 · ConstraintAn arbitrator ruled that POLITICO breached its journalists' union contract by publishing AI-written coverage without editorial review, and the company agreed in May 2026 to shut both tools down
Can move a judgementCannot move one (forecast, capability demo…)
Constraint2026-05-22Verified 2026-09-22
An arbitrator ruled that POLITICO breached its journalists' union contract by publishing AI-written coverage without editorial review, and the company agreed in May 2026 to shut both tools down

The PEN Guild is the union unit at POLITICO and E&E News and was a party to this arbitration, so this is one side of a bilateral agreement, published by the side that won. What is dated and specific in it: grievances filed in August 2024 over two products deployed without the 60-day notice, the good-faith bargaining and the human oversight that the unit first contract requires; a ruling on 26 November 2025 that the collective bargaining agreement had been violated; and an agreement announced on 22 May 2026 under which Capitol AI Report-Builder is shut down and the Live Summaries feature will not be revived. Both products are named, and so is what they produced: unedited live coverage of the 2024 Democratic National Convention and the vice-presidential debate, and branded policy reports for POLITICO Pro subscribers, produced without any editorial review, which the union says contained glaring factual errors. Three things to hold onto. The arbitration award itself is not published, so the sentence quoted from it — that AI, as used in these instances, cannot yet rival the hallmarks of human output — is as the union quotes it and not as the document reads. No statement from the employer could be found on its own site or in anything else it publishes, so the agreement to shut the tools down is reported by the other party. And the finding on record is a contract breach rather than a judgement about the work: it establishes that at one newsroom the machine was required to stop, not that it could not do the job. The two sit close together here, because the quoted sentence turns on accuracy, but they are not the same finding.

Failure, rollback, regulation or cost is suppressing adoption. Can lower an assessment or widen its uncertainty.

PEN Guild (POLITICO and E&E News Guild, NewsGuild-CWA) — release of 22 May 2026 ↗Full impact card →
Deployment2025-07-22Verified 2026-09-11
Pew found Google users clicked a search result in 8% of visits when an AI summary appeared, against 15% when it did not, and clicked a link inside the summary in 1%

United States, March 2025, 900 adults who agreed to share their browsing — a behavioural panel, not the whole web, and Google only. It measures clicking, not revenue and not employment. One finding cuts against the simple reading: news sites made up 5% of the sources cited in AI summaries and also 5% of those in standard results, so the summaries are not citing news less than ordinary search did. What collapsed is the click, not the citation.

An employer has put it into production. Can move the baseline — weighted by scale and how similar the setting is.

Pew Research Center ↗Full impact card →
Constraint2025-05-18Verified 2026-09-10
The Chicago Sun-Times and Philadelphia Inquirer printed a syndicated summer reading list with books that do not exist; the paper said the freelancer used an AI tool and the section was not reviewed

US newspapers; a syndicated special section produced by King Features (Hearst), not by newsroom staff. King Features said it ended its relationship with the writer; the chief executive of Chicago Public Media, which runs the Sun-Times, said the section was inserted into the paper without review from its editorial team.

Failure, rollback, regulation or cost is suppressing adoption. Can lower an assessment or widen its uncertainty.

NBC News ↗Full impact card →
Constraint2025-05-07Verified 2026-10-15
WIRED published and then retracted a freelance story that turned out to be an AI fabrication; two AI detectors had judged it human-written

One magazine. The publication's own account says it published the story on 7 May 2025; that when an editor became suspicious, two third-party AI-detection tools said the copy was likely human-generated; that closer examination of the story's details and further correspondence with the writer made clear it was an AI fabrication; and that the story had not gone through a proper fact-check or a senior edit. A failure in real use, caught by people checking details, not by tools; one case.

Failure, rollback, regulation or cost is suppressing adoption. Can lower an assessment or widen its uncertainty.

WIRED — 'How WIRED Got Rolled by an AI Freelancer' (21 August 2025) ↗Full impact card →
Constraint2023-08-15Verified 2026-10-15
The Associated Press treats generative AI output as unvetted source material and requires its journalists to apply its sourcing standards

One news agency. The agency's published standards say the central role of the AP journalist, gathering, evaluating and ordering facts, will not change; that any output from a generative AI tool should be treated as unvetted source material and AP staff must apply their editorial judgement and AP's sourcing standards when considering any information for publication; and that AP journalists are responsible for the accuracy and fairness of what they share. An employer's own rule for its staff; one organisation.

Failure, rollback, regulation or cost is suppressing adoption. Can lower an assessment or widen its uncertainty.

The Associated Press — 'Standards around generative AI' (15 August 2023) ↗Full impact card →
Labour impact2023-05-22Verified 2026-10-09
The BBC brought about 60 journalists into a forensic verification unit, citing manipulated video and AI-driven disinformation

United Kingdom. The head of BBC News writes that the growth of manipulated and distorted video means seeing is no longer believing, that AI weaponises and turbocharges disinformation, and that BBC Verify comprises about 60 journalists forming a specialised operation with forensic investigative and open-source intelligence skills, fact-checking, verifying video and countering disinformation. One newsroom; the staff were brought together from across the BBC rather than newly hired, and the share of their work spent on synthetic media is not stated.

Verifiable change in hiring, headcount, hours or job scope. Highest weight — but causal attribution still has to be argued, not assumed.

BBC News — Deborah Turness, CEO of BBC News, 'Explaining the "how" - the launch of BBC Verify' (22 May 2023) ↗Full impact card →
What it means for you

What this means for you#

If you are starting out

Be honest with yourself that the industry's problem is mostly economic, and the technology accelerates the shrinking of the entry-level, rewrite-heavy jobs that used to pay while you learned. The parts that remain — sourcing, verification, editorial judgement — are also the parts that make someone a good journalist, so the path is shorter and steeper rather than closed. Pick a beat where knowing people matters and generic content cannot substitute: local institutions, a technical field, a place.

If you are experienced

Your sources, your beat knowledge and your byline's credibility are the assets, and none of them automate. What is changing is the ratio of reporters to output an outlet expects, and the growing demand for verification skill. Reporters who can prove things are becoming more valuable relative to reporters who can write things; if you are the former, say so plainly in how you position yourself.

Your options#

Four directions, each with its real constraints and one thing you can test this week. Continuing as you are is a legitimate choice — it just has to be a chosen one.

Stay and strengthen

Own a beat that requires knowing people

Automated output is strongest where information is already public. It is weakest where the story lives in relationships — courts, councils, hospitals, a specific industry.

Real constraints

Takes years to build and is tied to a place or a field, which limits mobility.

Test this week

List the people who would take your call today and tell you something not yet public. That number, more than your clippings, is your position in the profession.

Reshape the role

Become the verification specialist

Synthetic media made verification a distinct, scarce skill. Newsrooms need it, so do platforms, NGOs and legal teams.

Real constraints

Technical and unglamorous, and the tooling changes fast enough that the learning never stops.

Test this week

Take one viral clip from this week and write a short, methodical note on how you would establish whether it is genuine. Publish the method, not the verdict.

Adjacent move

Research and investigation outside newsrooms

Due diligence firms, think tanks, compliance teams and public-interest organisations pay for exactly the finding-out and verifying skills, often more steadily than news does.

Real constraints

Less public, sometimes confidential, and the writing is for a client rather than a reader.

Test this week

Find three job postings for research or investigations roles outside media and mark which requirements you already meet. Usually it is most of them.

Common questions#

Will AI write the news instead of journalists?

It already writes the part of the news that was never really journalism — results, summaries, rewrites of things already public. What it cannot do is find out something a person does not want known, decide whether it is true, and take responsibility for publishing it. Those three tasks are the profession, and they are getting scarcer and more valuable, not less. The honest concern is not that machines will do the job; it is that fewer people will be paid to do it, and that the entry-level work which used to fund learning it is disappearing.

How long do I have?

The signal is what your newsroom does with commodity output — results, filings, press releases. When those are drafted automatically and a person only checks them, the entry-level reporting jobs that used to be built on that work are gone, which is a staffing decision rather than an announcement.

Which part of my work is actually at risk?

Rewriting press releases and routine results — the task marked automating here. Sourcing and editorial judgement are not, but relationships protect the reporter who already has them and do nothing for the entry jobs where those relationships used to be built.

Is verification work a growth area?

More verification work is not more verification jobs. Synthetic media has made the job harder in absolute terms, but the extra step usually lands on the same reporters, and newsrooms that cannot fund a dedicated desk simply publish with less checking.

Studying towards this?

These majors lead here. Their pages break down which of their competencies transfer and what graduates typically lack.

Journalism / Communication →
How we know

What these judgements rest on#

5 of 5 task judgements on this page are backed by a verified event and 0 are platform inference, each labelled where it appears. Behind them sit 1 technology dimensions, a reconstructed trajectory since language models reached the public, and 6 verified events.

See which technologies, how it got here, and the method →

Where it sits in the official classification: skills, knowledge, related jobs →

Other roles in the same function#

A company divides its work into functions before it divides it into jobs. These sit in Core delivery (industry-specific) alongside this one — a fact about org charts, not a judgement that they are similar or that they are changing in the same direction.

Content moderator · Registered nurse · Nurse practitioner · Midwife · Radiologist · Pathologist · Radiographer / radiologic technologist · General practitioner / primary care doctor · Surgeon · Anaesthesiologist / anaesthetist · Respiratory therapist · Optometrist · Care worker / nursing assistant · Counsellor / psychotherapist · Psychologist · Dietitian / nutritionist · Pharmacist · Pharmacy technician · School teacher · Driving instructor · University lecturer · Chef / cook · Electrician · Plumber · HVAC technician · Architect · Building inspector · Drafter / CAD technician · Interior designer · Civil / structural engineer · Land surveyor · Urban planner · GIS analyst / cartographer · Electrical engineer · Chip design engineer · Mechanical engineer · Industrial engineer · Quantity surveyor · Editor and proofreader · Translator / Interpreter · Interpreter · Retail cashier / shop assistant · Bank teller · Medical assistant / clinic assistant · Waiter / restaurant server · Bartender / barista · Hairdresser / barber · Construction worker · Bricklayer / blocklayer · Carpenter / joiner · Auto mechanic / vehicle technician · Medical laboratory technician · Physiotherapist / rehabilitation therapist · Speech-language pathologist / speech and language therapist · Occupational therapist · Phlebotomist · Massage therapist · Firefighter · Paramedic / EMT · Police officer · Emergency dispatcher · Farmer · Gardener / landscaper · Social worker · Dentist · Dental hygienist · Dental assistant / dental nurse · Veterinarian · Librarian · Welder · Machinist / CNC machinist · Sonographer