LO
Get told when a verified record lands on this occupation → · Mark which of these tasks are yours (VOLO Pro, free) → · For a team or a graduating class →
General practitioner / primary care doctor
The doctor a person sees first: works out what is wrong when the problem has not been sorted into a specialty yet, decides what to do about it, and carries the consequence of being wrong.
Take ten of your own signed notes from the last month and read them as if you had not been there. Count how many you would have to ask a question about.
This is not a probability of losing your job. It combines how much of the role's task load is exposed to automation with how far adoption has actually gone — useful for comparing occupations on one consistent basis, and for nothing else.
Written for doctors in general and primary care — the consultation where the problem arrives undifferentiated. Hospital specialists, surgeons and radiologists have different task mixes and radiology has its own page here. Health systems differ enormously in who holds the prescribing pen and who controls the referral, and that is the single biggest thing this page cannot generalise across.
What is actually changing#
The unit of analysis is the task, not the job title. A role is not replaced — its task mix shifts.
Each tile is one task. Its size is how much of the job it is; its colour is where the task is heading. Click a tile to see what the judgement does not establish.
Time saved on the note is not time given back to the doctor — in most systems it is absorbed by seeing more patients, and whether it lands as relief or as throughput is a management decision made after the tool arrives, not a property of the tool. Nor does it touch what the note is for: a record written to be defensible is a different document from one written to be useful, and automation has so far made the first cheaper without making the second better.
A tool being good at the diagnosis does not put it in the room, and in most systems what reaches the consultation is decided by procurement, liability and the electronic record vendor rather than by accuracy. Read the direction as a statement about where the capability is pointing, not as a forecast about your clinic — and note that the same tool arriving can change the job without changing who does it, by turning the doctor into the person who overrides a suggestion and documents why.
Hard to automate is not the same as valued: in several systems the examination is already the part squeezed hardest by appointment length, and a task can be eroded by the clock without any technology touching it. Remote consultation has removed it entirely from a growing share of visits, and that happened for reasons of cost and access rather than capability.
This being human does not protect the headcount, because it is the part of the visit that scales worst and is therefore the first to be rationed — pushed to a nurse, a leaflet, a follow-up call that does not happen. Read it as a statement about who must do it, not about how many minutes anyone will be given to do it in.
Protection by regulation is a policy choice, and policy changes: several jurisdictions have already widened who may prescribe, and each widening moved work without removing the pen. The safe thing here is the signature, not the hours behind it — and a system can keep the doctor's name on the prescription while moving the consultation that produced it to somebody cheaper.
Is this your job? Say so and this page narrows to your share of it.
A job title is a bundle of tasks bought together, and no two people hold the same bundle. Nothing is sent anywhere — it stays in this browser.
Read all 5 tasks in full — direction, reasoning and limits →
Recent changes#
NAICS 6211, offices of physicians, all employees, seasonally adjusted. This counts everyone a practice employs — receptionists, medical assistants, nurses, billing staff — so a rise here is not evidence that more doctors are employed, and the composition could shift toward support staff without the series moving differently. It also excludes physicians working in hospitals, which is a large share in many systems, and it says nothing about hours, panel size or how appointment length is changing, which is where this occupation's actual pressure shows up.
Verifiable change in hiring, headcount, hours or job scope. Highest weight — but causal attribution still has to be argued, not assumed.
Read on the Digital Agency's own statute portal, in the version in force from 21 May 2026; the Act dates from 1948. Article 20 states that a physician shall not provide treatment, or issue a medical certificate or a prescription, without personally examining the patient; shall not issue a birth or stillbirth certificate without personally attending; and shall not issue a postmortem certificate without personally conducting the examination. One exception is written in: a death certificate for a patient under treatment who dies within twenty-four hours of the consultation. Article 33-3 makes a breach of Article 20 punishable by a fine of up to ¥500,000, so this is a criminal prohibition on the physician personally, not a professional guideline. State plainly what this record does not cover: the Act does not define what personally examining requires, and how it applies to remote or video consultation is set by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare guidance that was not read for this record — so nothing here should be taken to mean the physician must be in the room. What it does establish is narrower and harder: the prescription is attached to an act by a named licensed person, and the law does not contemplate that act being performed by anything else. It binds practice in Japan and counts nobody.
Failure, rollback, regulation or cost is suppressing adoption. Can lower an assessment or widen its uncertainty.
Ontario, Canada. The regulator's policy says physicians must engage in a dialogue with the patient or substitute decision-maker and answer their questions before obtaining consent, that a physician may ask another health-care provider to obtain consent only if assured that provider has the knowledge, skill and judgement required, and that the physicians involved in the treatment are ultimately responsible for the consent being obtained. Reviewed and updated March 2025 (month only). It does not mention AI and covers consent to treatment, not every decision.
Failure, rollback, regulation or cost is suppressing adoption. Can lower an assessment or widen its uncertainty.
United Kingdom. The regulator's core standards say that in providing clinical care a doctor must adequately assess the patient's condition, taking account of their history and views, carry out a physical examination where necessary, and promptly provide or arrange suitable advice, investigation or treatment. In effect from 30 January 2024 (updated 13 December 2024 for physician associates). It puts the duty on the doctor; it does not say machines cannot capture parts of an examination.
Failure, rollback, regulation or cost is suppressing adoption. Can lower an assessment or widen its uncertainty.
What this means for you#
The entry ladder in medicine is unusually well protected by training requirements, so the first thing to change for you is not whether you get a job but what the job consists of — expect the documentation to be drafted for you from day one, and expect to be assessed on whether you caught what the draft got wrong. The skill that used to be built by writing a thousand notes has to be built some other way, and nobody has said how.
Your leverage is in the two tasks that do not compress: the examination and the conversation where something is decided. The risk is not that they get automated, it is that they get rationed while the parts that were automated free up minutes that management books as capacity. The thing worth defending in a negotiation is appointment length, not scope of practice.
Your options#
Four directions, each with its real constraints and one thing you can test this week. Continuing as you are is a legitimate choice — it just has to be a chosen one.
Become the person who audits what the tools wrote
Where a tool drafts the visit note, somebody has to find out how often the draft was wrong in a way the signer did not catch. Someone has to design that check, and it has to be a clinician.
It is unpaid in most job plans and invisible in most appraisals, so it has to be negotiated as sessions rather than absorbed.
Take ten of your own signed notes from the last month and read them as if you had not been there. Count how many you would have to ask a question about.
Move toward the undifferentiated end
The further a problem is from being labelled, the less any tool can do with it — and the more of the job is deciding what question to ask. That end of the work is also where the shortage is.
It is the harder end, it carries more uncertainty and more risk, and in fee-based systems it is often paid less than procedural work.
Look at your last twenty consultations and mark which arrived with a label already attached. That ratio is your exposure.
Clinical safety for the tools themselves
The rules on this page put examining, obtaining consent and prescribing on a named doctor personally, so a tool that touches those acts needs a clinician who can answer for it. Health systems are discovering they do not have that person.
It moves you away from patients, and the pay in safety roles is usually below clinical pay.
Find out who in your organisation signs off a clinical decision-support tool before it goes live. If the answer takes more than two calls, that is the gap.
Common questions#
Not as a single event, and the more useful question is which parts of the visit move. On the evidence we hold, the documentation is moving first and fastest because a clinician reviews every draft, which gives the automation a referee. The examination and the conversation where something is decided are not moving, and the prescribing signature is held in place by law rather than by skill. What that adds up to is a job with the same name and a different inside — which is a real change and not the one the question usually means.
We do not answer this with a date, and any source that does is guessing. The signal to watch in this occupation is specific and you can check it yourself: how much of your appointment is spent on things a machine now drafts, and whether the minutes that freed up were given back to the consultation or booked as extra patients. The second question is answered by your rota, not by the technology — and it is the one that will actually change your working life.
Careful with what the comparison measures. The published scores are mostly on written cases, and a written case has already been cleaned up by whoever wrote it: the relevant facts are in, the irrelevant ones are out, and someone chose where the story begins. A real consultation hands you none of that. Until a benchmark makes the model do the asking — decide what to enquire about next from an incomplete story — the scores tell you about a different task from the one you do.
It is not what the evidence on this site shows anywhere else: in the deployments we have verified, time saved on documentation has been absorbed by volume rather than by headcount. But the honest answer is that this is a management decision made after the tool lands, not a property of the tool — and it is made in a budget meeting you are probably not in. The thing worth watching is whether appointment length moves, because that is where the decision becomes visible.
Studying towards this?
These majors lead here. Their pages break down which of their competencies transfer and what graduates typically lack.
What these judgements rest on#
5 of 5 task judgements on this page are backed by a verified event and 0 are platform inference, each labelled where it appears. Behind them sit 3 technology dimensions, a reconstructed trajectory since language models reached the public, and 4 verified events.
See which technologies, how it got here, and the method →
Where it sits in the official classification: skills, knowledge, related jobs →
Other roles in the same function#
A company divides its work into functions before it divides it into jobs. These sit in Core delivery (industry-specific) alongside this one — a fact about org charts, not a judgement that they are similar or that they are changing in the same direction.
Content moderator · Registered nurse · Nurse practitioner · Midwife · Radiologist · Pathologist · Radiographer / radiologic technologist · Surgeon · Anaesthesiologist / anaesthetist · Respiratory therapist · Optometrist · Care worker / nursing assistant · Counsellor / psychotherapist · Psychologist · Dietitian / nutritionist · Pharmacist · Pharmacy technician · School teacher · Driving instructor · University lecturer · Chef / cook · Electrician · Plumber · HVAC technician · Architect · Building inspector · Drafter / CAD technician · Interior designer · Civil / structural engineer · Land surveyor · Urban planner · GIS analyst / cartographer · Electrical engineer · Chip design engineer · Mechanical engineer · Industrial engineer · Quantity surveyor · Journalist · Editor and proofreader · Translator / Interpreter · Interpreter · Retail cashier / shop assistant · Bank teller · Medical assistant / clinic assistant · Waiter / restaurant server · Bartender / barista · Hairdresser / barber · Construction worker · Bricklayer / blocklayer · Carpenter / joiner · Auto mechanic / vehicle technician · Medical laboratory technician · Physiotherapist / rehabilitation therapist · Speech-language pathologist / speech and language therapist · Occupational therapist · Phlebotomist · Massage therapist · Firefighter · Paramedic / EMT · Police officer · Emergency dispatcher · Farmer · Gardener / landscaper · Social worker · Dentist · Dental hygienist · Dental assistant / dental nurse · Veterinarian · Librarian · Welder · Machinist / CNC machinist · Sonographer