VOLOVLOAutomation risk & transition, task by task
AskOccupationsMajorsBusinessFoundersChangesNotesMethod
Search occupations, majors…
EN
  • English
  • 简体中文
  • 日本語
  • Español
  • Português
  • Français
VLO
VOLO

Understanding how automation changes work — task by task, with the evidence shown and the uncertainty admitted.

AskOccupationsMajorsBusinessFoundersChangesNotesMethodWill AI replace my job?AboutRole diagnosisOpen dataOntologyVOLO ProPrivacyTerms
© 2026 VOLO
Guides
Ask VOLOFor businessFor foundersRecent changesNotesRole diagnosisFirst AI experimentVOLO ProMethod & evidenceAboutFollow an occupationSearch
Occupations
All occupations
AI / software
Translator / InterpreterBank tellerCopywriterContent moderatorCustomer service representativeAdministrative assistantSoftware tester / QA engineerGraphic designerParalegalVideo editorAccountant / BookkeeperMarketing specialistFrontend developerTax preparer / tax agentVoice actorMedical coderData analystInsurance claims handlerTechnical writer / documentation engineerJunior software developerInsurance underwriterHR / recruiterLoan officer / credit officerFinancial analystProcurement / supply chain specialistJournalistSales / account managerReal estate agentIT support specialist / helpdeskAuditorManagement consultantBackend developerAI researcherProduct / UX designerBusiness systems ownerE-commerce operations specialistActuaryRadiologistData engineerProject managerLawyerMedical assistant / clinic assistantQuantity surveyorMachine learning engineerExperienced software engineerDevOps / platform / SRE engineerProduct managerPharmacistPartnerships / channel managerSecurity analyst (SOC)Financial adviser / financial plannerCompliance officerLibrarianArchitectFirst-line manager / team supervisorCounsellor / therapistRetail salesperson / shop assistantCivil / structural engineerSecurity guardBus driverInsurance agentSchool teacherGeneral practitioner / primary care doctorAirline pilotWaiter / restaurant serverRadiographer / radiologic technologistAuto mechanic / vehicle technicianPolice officerSonographerAir traffic controllerVeterinarianPhysiotherapist / rehabilitation therapistDentistConstruction workerSocial workerRegistered nurseCare worker / nursing assistantPlumberAI implementation lead
RPA / self-service
Government service clerkOperations coordinatorMetro train driverReceptionist / front desk
Robotics
Retail cashier / shop assistantContainer port workerWarehouse workerAssembly line workerMedical laboratory technicianWelderChef / cookCleaner / janitorFarmerFirefighterCabin crewElectrician
Autonomous driving
Ride-hail / taxi driverTruck driverDelivery rider / courier
Majors
All majorsEnglish / Foreign languagesComputer scienceAccountingPsychologyJournalism / CommunicationFinanceLawVisual communication designMarketingNursingBusiness administrationEducation and teacher trainingArchitecturePublic administrationMedicineHospitality and tourism managementEconomicsInformation systems
Enter as:I have a jobI am studyingI run a companyI am building something
Recent changes›Police officer›2024-05-16
ConstraintCognitive automation2024-05-16

Maryland's 2024 law bars facial recognition results from being the sole basis for probable cause or identification, and requires a trained person to verify every result first

Police officeroccupation page →
Event date / reported
2024-05-16
Evidence stage
ConstraintFailure, rollback, regulation or cost is suppressing adoption. Can lower an assessment or widen its uncertainty.
Tasks this bears on
Investigating a case
Gathering evidence and statements, working out what happened, and deciding what action the facts support.
Being augmented✓ Evidence-backed
Where this applies
A Maryland statute binding police officers and other employees of law enforcement agencies, approved on 16 May 2024 and in force from 1 October 2024. Results generated by facial recognition technology may not serve as the sole basis to establish probable cause or the positive identification of an individual in a criminal investigation or proceeding, and before being used for any purpose in a criminal investigation a result shall be independently verified by an individual who has completed the required training. It governs how an investigative lead from a machine may be used and requires a person to check it; it does not measure how often facial recognition is used or how investigations have changed.
What this means
Where a machine now suggests who someone is, the law in Maryland keeps the investigation with people: the match cannot carry the case alone, and a trained person must check it before it is used at all.
What it does not yet show
It is one state's law about one technology; it does not show how often police use facial recognition or whether verification is done well.
What you can check
Open Maryland Chapter 808 of 2024 (SB 182) and find "RESULTS GENERATED BY FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY MAY NOT SERVE AS THE SOLE BASIS TO ESTABLISH PROBABLE CAUSE".
Does it change the assessment?
No. The impact index is never moved by a single event. What this record did: the 1 linked task judgement above now rest on evidence instead of inference.
Source
State of Maryland — Chapter 808 of 2024 (Senate Bill 182), Criminal Procedure — Facial Recognition Technology — Requirements, Procedures, and Prohibitions (approved by the Governor, May 16, 2024; effective October 1, 2024) · verified 2026-09-27 · Claude (VOLO agent) · interpreted 2026-09-27 · Claude (VOLO agent)
Primary source — published by the party that did this, or the authority of record. No co-signature needed.
All changes for Police officer →All recent changes →How events become evidence →