VOLOVLOAutomation risk & transition, task by task
AskOccupationsMajorsBusinessFoundersChangesNotesMethod
Search occupations, majors…
EN
  • English
  • 简体中文
  • 日本語
  • Español
  • Português
  • Français
VLO
VOLO

Understanding how automation changes work — task by task, with the evidence shown and the uncertainty admitted.

AskOccupationsMajorsBusinessFoundersChangesNotesMethodAboutRole diagnosisPrivacyTerms
© 2026 VOLO
Guides
Ask VOLOFor businessFor foundersRecent changesNotesRole diagnosisFirst AI experimentMethod & evidenceAboutFollow an occupationSearch
Occupations
All occupations
AI / software
Translator / InterpreterBank tellerCopywriterContent moderatorCustomer service representativeAdministrative assistantSoftware tester / QA engineerGraphic designerParalegalVideo editorAccountant / BookkeeperMarketing specialistFrontend developerData analystInsurance claims handlerTechnical writer / documentation engineerJunior software developerHR / recruiterLoan officer / credit officerFinancial analystProcurement / supply chain specialistJournalistSales / account managerReal estate agentIT support specialist / helpdeskAuditorManagement consultantBackend developerAI researcherProduct / UX designerBusiness systems ownerE-commerce operations specialistActuaryRadiologistData engineerLawyerMedical assistant / clinic assistantMachine learning engineerExperienced software engineerDevOps / platform / SRE engineerProduct managerPharmacistPartnerships / channel managerSecurity analyst (SOC)Compliance officerArchitectFirst-line manager / team supervisorCounsellor / therapistRetail salesperson / shop assistantCivil / structural engineerSecurity guardBus driverSchool teacherGeneral practitioner / primary care doctorAirline pilotWaiter / restaurant serverAuto mechanic / vehicle technicianPolice officerAir traffic controllerPhysiotherapist / rehabilitation therapistConstruction workerRegistered nurseCare worker / nursing assistantAI implementation lead
RPA / self-service
Government service clerkOperations coordinatorMetro train driverReceptionist / front desk
Robotics
Retail cashier / shop assistantContainer port workerWarehouse workerAssembly line workerMedical laboratory technicianChef / cookCleaner / janitorFarmerFirefighterCabin crewElectrician
Autonomous driving
Ride-hail / taxi driverTruck driverDelivery rider / courier
Majors
All majorsEnglish / Foreign languagesComputer scienceAccountingPsychologyJournalism / CommunicationFinanceLawVisual communication designMarketingNursingBusiness administrationEducation and teacher trainingArchitecturePublic administrationMedicineHospitality and tourism managementEconomicsInformation systems
Enter as:I have a jobI am studyingI run a companyI am building something
Recent changes›Cabin crew›1965-03-09
ConstraintPhysical automation1965-03-09

US federal rules require one flight attendant per 50 seats above 100, seated near the exits for take-off and landing

Cabin crewoccupation page →
Event date / reported
1965-03-09
Evidence stage
ConstraintFailure, rollback, regulation or cost is suppressing adoption. Can lower an assessment or widen its uncertainty.
Tasks this bears on
Being ready to evacuate the aircraft
Sitting at an assigned exit for take-off and landing, and in an emergency opening the exits, commanding passengers and getting everyone off within seconds.
Still human-led✓ Evidence-backed
Where this applies
The current text of 14 CFR 121.391 on the government's own eCFR, originally published at 30 FR 3206 on 9 March 1965 and amended since. It requires one flight attendant on aeroplanes with more than 9 or 19 (by payload) but fewer than 51 seats, two for 51 to 100 seats, and two plus one for each unit or part of a unit of 50 seats above 100. If an operator's emergency evacuation demonstration used more attendants than that, it may not later fly the aeroplane with fewer. During take-off and landing, the required flight attendants must sit as near as practicable to the required floor-level exits and be uniformly distributed through the aeroplane, to provide the most effective egress of passengers in an emergency evacuation. It establishes a legal minimum and its stated safety purpose in the United States; it does not say how many attendants airlines roster above it, and it says nothing about onboard service.
What this means
US federal rules require flight attendants in proportion to seats and seat them near the exits for take-off and landing, stating that the purpose is the most effective evacuation of passengers.
What it does not yet show
It is a minimum with a stated safety purpose; it says nothing about how many attendants airlines carry above it or about onboard service.
What you can check
Read the section yourself and check whether your aircraft type's evacuation demonstration set a higher crew number than the seat count alone would.
Does it change the assessment?
No. The impact index is never moved by a single event. What this record did: the 1 linked task judgement above now rest on evidence instead of inference.
Source
Electronic Code of Federal Regulations — 14 CFR 121.391, Flight attendants · verified 2026-09-23 · Claude (VOLO agent) — source text fetched and cross-checked · interpreted 2026-09-23 · Claude (VOLO agent)
Primary source — published by the party that did this, or the authority of record. No co-signature needed.
All changes for Cabin crew →All recent changes →How events become evidence →