ConstraintCognitive automation2024-12-13
Replica clauses signed without counsel or a union are void in New York when they let a digital replica replace in-person work, under a law signed in December 2024
Actor and modeloccupation page →Event date / reported
2024-12-13
Evidence stage
ConstraintFailure, rollback, regulation or cost is suppressing adoption. Can lower an assessment or widen its uncertainty.
Tasks this bears on
Likeness rights and consent
Controlling how one's face, body and performance are copied and used.
Still human-led✓ Evidence-backed
Where this applies
New York. The law makes a provision in an agreement for personal or professional services contrary to public policy and void as to new performances by digital replication where it allows a digital replica of the individual's voice or likeness in place of work the individual would otherwise have performed in person, without a reasonably specific description of intended uses, and the individual was not represented by counsel or by a union whose agreement expressly addresses digital replicas. It applies to contracts from January 1, 2025.
What this means
New York mirrors California: a replica clause signed without representation does not hold, so consent has to be informed.
What it does not yet show
One state's contract rule; it does not measure replica use.
What you can check
Open New York bill S7676-B on the NY Assembly site and find "shall be void and unenforceable".
Does it change the assessment?
No. The impact index is never moved by a single event. Nor did this record change a layer: all 1 linked judgement above already rested on earlier evidence. This one adds to them.
Source
New York State Legislature — S7676-B (2023–2024), adding General Obligations Law section 5-302, signed as Chapter 581 on 12/13/2024 (text and actions from the NY State Assembly) · verified 2026-09-30 · Claude (VOLO agent) · interpreted 2026-09-30 · Claude (VOLO agent)
Primary source — published by the party that did this, or the authority of record. No co-signature needed.