VOLOVLOAutomation risk & transition, task by task
AskOccupationsMajorsBusinessFoundersChangesNotesMethod
Search occupations, majors…
EN
  • English
  • 简体中文
  • 日本語
  • Español
  • Português
  • Français
VLO
VOLO

Understanding how automation changes work — task by task, with the evidence shown and the uncertainty admitted.

AskOccupationsMajorsBusinessFoundersChangesNotesMethodWill AI replace my job?AboutRole diagnosisOpen dataOntologyVOLO ProPrivacyTerms
© 2026 VOLO
Occupations
All occupations
AI / software
Translator / InterpreterBank tellerCopywriterContent moderatorCustomer service representativeAdministrative assistantSoftware tester / QA engineerData entry clerkGraphic designerParalegalVideo editorAccountant / BookkeeperMarketing specialistFrontend developerTax preparer / tax agentVoice actorMedical coderData analystInsurance claims handlerTechnical writer / documentation engineerJunior software developerInsurance underwriterHR / recruiterLoan officer / credit officerFinancial analystProcurement / supply chain specialistJournalistSales / account managerReal estate agentNetwork engineerIllustratorIT support specialist / helpdeskAuditorSupply chain plannerManagement consultantPhotographerBackend developerAI researcherProduct / UX designerBusiness systems ownerE-commerce operations specialistActuaryAnimator and VFX artistWriter and authorRadiologistData engineerProject managerData scientistCourt reporterEditor and proofreaderLawyerMedical assistant / clinic assistantQuantity surveyorContent creatorQuantitative analystMachine learning engineerExperienced software engineerDevOps / platform / SRE engineerBusiness analystMusician and composerProduct managerPharmacistPartnerships / channel managerSecurity analyst (SOC)Financial adviser / financial plannerInterpreterCompliance officerLibrarianArchitectFirst-line manager / team supervisorCounsellor / therapistRetail salesperson / shop assistantCivil / structural engineerElectrical engineerIndustrial engineerSecurity guardInterior designerUniversity lecturerBus driverInsurance agentMechanical engineerSchool teacherGeneral practitioner / primary care doctorAirline pilotWaiter / restaurant serverRadiographer / radiologic technologistAuto mechanic / vehicle technicianPolice officerSonographerAircraft maintenance technicianAir traffic controllerVeterinarianPhysiotherapist / rehabilitation therapistDentistSurgeonConstruction workerSocial workerRegistered nurseCare worker / nursing assistantPlumberAI implementation lead
RPA / self-service
Government service clerkOperations coordinatorMetro train driverReceptionist / front deskPharmacy technician
Robotics
Retail cashier / shop assistantContainer port workerWarehouse workerAssembly line workerMedical laboratory technicianActor and modelWelderChef / cookCleaner / janitorFarmerFirefighterCabin crewElectrician
Autonomous driving
Ride-hail / taxi driverTruck driverDelivery rider / courier
Majors
All majorsEnglish / Foreign languagesComputer scienceAccountingPsychologyJournalism / CommunicationFinanceLawVisual communication designMarketingNursingBusiness administrationEducation and teacher trainingArchitecturePublic administrationMedicineHospitality and tourism managementEconomicsInformation systems
Guides
Ask VOLOFor businessFor foundersRecent changesNotesRole diagnosisFirst AI experimentVOLO ProMethod & evidenceAboutFollow an occupationSearch
You are reading as:I have a jobI am studyingI run a companyI am building something
On this pageWriting fiction and booksScreenwriting and rewritesShort fiction and open submission marketsRights and licensing
Occupations›Writer and author›Tasks, one by one

Writer and author — tasks, one by one

The unit of analysis is the task, not the job title. Each one below carries its direction, whether the judgement rests on evidence or on platform inference, the reasoning, and what it does not establish.

Tasks
4
With evidence
3/4
Assessed
2026-09-30
Automating×1Being augmented×1Still human-led×2

Every task on this page#

Writing fiction and books

Being augmented≈ Platform inference

Drafting novels, stories and non-fiction books.

AI / software
Why

Prompted models still fall short, but the gap closes with training on an author's work. Stories generated by language models passed 3–10 times fewer creativity tests than stories by professional authors, and critics rated a world-class novelist above GPT-4 Turbo on every dimension. Yet in a preregistered study, expert readers who disfavoured prompted AI imitations of 50 authors' styles favoured them once the model was fine-tuned on each author's complete works, and detectors flagged only 3% of those outputs.

What this does NOT mean

Studies of short excerpts and stories, not novels; they measure quality judgements, not what readers buy or writers earn.

Screenwriting and rewrites

Still human-led✓ Evidence-backed

Writing and rewriting scripts for film and television.

AI / software
Why

The US screenwriters' contract keeps the writer human. It says neither traditional AI nor generative AI is a writer, that AI-produced material is not literary material or source material for credit, and that a company may not require a writer to use ChatGPT to write literary material; a writer needs the company's consent to use generative AI. The 2026 agreement preserves these terms to 2030.

What this does NOT mean

One US collective agreement for signatory companies; non-union and other countries' work is not covered.

Short fiction and open submission markets

Automating✓ Evidence-backed

Selling stories and books through open submissions and self-publishing.

AI / software
Why

Open markets are where machine-written volume lands. The editor of Clarkesworld, a science-fiction magazine, reported a surge of spam submissions in February 2023 and temporarily closed submissions after more than 50 arrived in one morning; the magazine does not consider AI-written or AI-assisted work.

What this does NOT mean

One magazine's account from 2023; it shows volume arriving, not how many writers lost sales.

Rights and licensing

Still human-led✓ Evidence-backed

Controlling and licensing the use of one's books and scripts, including for AI training.

RPA / self-service
Why

Courts have set some terms. In Bartz v. Anthropic, a federal judge held training on the books at issue was fair use but that using pirated copies for a central library was not; the case settled for $1.5 billion, about $3,000 per work. In Kadrey v. Meta, the judge ruled for Meta on that record but said the ruling does not mean such training is lawful and that market dilution was the plaintiffs' potentially winning argument. The 2026 screenwriters' agreement requires notice to the union when scripts are licensed to train AI.

What this does NOT mean

Two district-court rulings that bind no other court, one settlement covering past conduct, and one US contract; the law is still developing.

← Back to Writer and authorNext: what these judgements rest on →Skills, knowledge and related jobs (O*NET) →