VOLOVLOAutomation risk & transition, task by task
AskOccupationsMajorsBusinessFoundersChangesNotesMethod
Search occupations, majors…
EN
  • English
  • 简体中文
  • 日本語
  • Español
  • Português
  • Français
VLO
VOLO

Understanding how automation changes work — task by task, with the evidence shown and the uncertainty admitted.

AskOccupationsMajorsBusinessFoundersChangesNotesMethodWill AI replace my job?AboutRole diagnosisOpen dataOntologyVOLO ProPrivacyTerms
© 2026 VOLO
Guides
Ask VOLOFor businessFor foundersRecent changesNotesRole diagnosisFirst AI experimentVOLO ProMethod & evidenceAboutFollow an occupationSearch
Occupations
All occupations
AI / software
Translator / InterpreterBank tellerCopywriterContent moderatorCustomer service representativeAdministrative assistantSoftware tester / QA engineerData entry clerkGraphic designerParalegalVideo editorAccountant / BookkeeperMarketing specialistFrontend developerTax preparer / tax agentVoice actorMedical coderData analystInsurance claims handlerTechnical writer / documentation engineerJunior software developerInsurance underwriterHR / recruiterLoan officer / credit officerFinancial analystProcurement / supply chain specialistJournalistSales / account managerReal estate agentNetwork engineerIllustratorTravel agent / advisorIT support specialist / helpdeskAuditorSupply chain plannerManagement consultantPhotographerBackend developerAI researcherProduct / UX designerBusiness systems ownerE-commerce operations specialistActuaryAnimator and VFX artistWriter and authorPayroll specialist / payroll clerkRadiologistData engineerProject managerData scientistCourt reporterEditor and proofreaderLawyerMedical assistant / clinic assistantQuantity surveyorContent creatorQuantitative analystMachine learning engineerExperienced software engineerDevOps / platform / SRE engineerBusiness analystMusician and composerGIS analyst / cartographerProduct managerDietitian / nutritionistPharmacistPartnerships / channel managerSecurity analyst (SOC)Financial adviser / financial plannerInterpreterPathologistChip design engineerCompliance officerLibrarianArchitectFirst-line manager / team supervisorCounsellor / therapistRetail salesperson / shop assistantCivil / structural engineerElectrical engineerIndustrial engineerSecurity guardInterior designerUniversity lecturerPsychologistBus driverInsurance agentMechanical engineerFashion designerOptometristSchool teacherGeneral practitioner / primary care doctorAirline pilotDriving instructorWaiter / restaurant serverRadiographer / radiologic technologistAuto mechanic / vehicle technicianPolice officerSonographerAircraft maintenance technicianDental hygienistAnaesthesiologist / anaesthetistAir traffic controllerVeterinarianBartender / baristaPhysiotherapist / rehabilitation therapistDentistSurgeonParamedic / EMTConstruction workerSocial workerJudge / magistrateRegistered nurseCare worker / nursing assistantPlumberAI implementation lead
RPA / self-service
Government service clerkOperations coordinatorMetro train driverReceptionist / front deskPharmacy technician
Robotics
Retail cashier / shop assistantContainer port workerWarehouse workerAssembly line workerMedical laboratory technicianActor and modelWelderChef / cookGardener / landscaperCleaner / janitorFarmerFirefighterHVAC technicianCabin crewHairdresser / barberElectrician
Autonomous driving
Ride-hail / taxi driverTruck driverDelivery rider / courier
Majors
All majorsEnglish / Foreign languagesComputer scienceAccountingPsychologyJournalism / CommunicationFinanceLawVisual communication designMarketingNursingBusiness administrationEducation and teacher trainingArchitecturePublic administrationMedicineHospitality and tourism managementEconomicsInformation systems
Enter as:I have a jobI am studyingI run a companyI am building something
Recent changes›Paramedic / EMT›2014-11-16
PilotPhysical automation2014-11-16

A mechanical chest-compression device showed no evidence of improving 30-day survival compared with manual compressions, a trial across four UK ambulance services found

Paramedic / EMToccupation page →
Event date / reported
2014-11-16
Evidence stage
PilotSmall-scale trial in a real setting. Tells us the deployment conditions are being tested, not that they hold — so one pilot is never enough on its own; two independent ones are.
Tasks this bears on
Treating patients on scene
Resuscitation, airway care, giving drugs, splinting, and lifting and moving patients in homes and on roads.
Still human-led✓ Evidence-backed
Where this applies
United Kingdom. A pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial in which ambulance vehicles at 91 stations in four services were assigned to a mechanical chest-compression device or manual CPR; 4,471 adults with cardiac arrest were enrolled between 2010 and 2013. The authors found no evidence of improvement in 30-day survival with the device compared with manual compressions.
What this means
The machine that does chest compressions did not save more lives than crews doing them by hand.
What it does not yet show
One device in one country's trial; it may still help in transport or with too few crew.
What you can check
Open the PARAMEDIC trial in The Lancet (doi 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61886-9) and find "no evidence of improvement in 30 day survival".
Does it change the assessment?
No. The impact index is never moved by a single event, and this stage does not move one on its own: a "Pilot" record counts toward a judgement but needs a second, independent record before the judgement rests on evidence. This one is counted; on its own it changed nothing.
Source
Perkins et al. — Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial, The Lancet (published online 16 November 2014) · verified 2026-09-30 · Claude (VOLO agent) · interpreted 2026-09-30 · Claude (VOLO agent)
Primary source — published by the party that did this, or the authority of record. No co-signature needed.
All changes for Paramedic / EMT →All recent changes →How events become evidence →