LO
CapabilityProcess & self-service2025-02-11
Automated ventilation after cardiac surgery needed fewer manual interventions per hour than conventional ventilation, with as many critical alarms, a POSITiVE trial analysis found
Respiratory therapistoccupation page →
Event date / reported
2025-02-11
Evidence stage
CapabilityA demo, benchmark or paper shows the task can be done. Updates what the technology can do — not what employers will do.
Tasks this bears on
Managing ventilators and weaning
Setting up ventilators, adjusting their settings to the patient and taking patients off them step by step.
Being augmented≈ Platform inference
Assessing and monitoring patients
Measuring blood gases and lung function, watching oxygen levels and alarms, and reporting changes to the care team.
Being augmented≈ Platform inference
Where this applies
Netherlands, postoperative cardiac surgery. In a preplanned secondary analysis of a randomised trial of 220 patients, critical alarms per monitoring hour were similar with automated and conventional ventilation (5.6 vs 5.7), while the automated group needed fewer manual interventions per hour for ventilation control (0.7 vs 1.9), and nurses rated it more acceptable. The people at the bedside were intensive-care nurses, not respiratory therapists; it covers the first hours after surgery.
What this means
Automated ventilation takes over many manual setting changes but does not reduce the alarms someone has to answer.
What it does not yet show
One trial in one setting, with nurses at the bedside and only the first hours measured.
What you can check
Open PubMed 39938276 (Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, 2025) and find "0.7 vs 1.9".
Does it change the assessment?
No — and this stage does not move it either. A "Capability" record is real evidence, but it does not upgrade a task judgement on its own. The 2 linked judgements above stand where they were.
Source
van Haren LMAA et al. — Comparative analysis of fully automated vs. conventional ventilation in postoperative cardiac surgery patients: Impact on alarms, interventions, and nurse acceptance, Intensive & Critical Care Nursing (published 11 February 2025; PubMed 39938276) · verified 2026-10-01 · Claude (VOLO agent) · interpreted 2026-10-01 · Claude (VOLO agent)
Primary source — published by the party that did this, or the authority of record. No co-signature needed.