LO
CapabilityProcess & self-service2025-02-11
Intensive-care nurses made fewer manual ventilator interventions per hour with automated ventilation after cardiac surgery but answered as many critical alarms, a POSITiVE trial analysis found
Registered nurseoccupation page →
Event date / reported
2025-02-11
Evidence stage
CapabilityA demo, benchmark or paper shows the task can be done. Updates what the technology can do — not what employers will do.
Tasks this bears on
Monitoring and knowing when to escalate
Watching a patient over hours, integrating what the monitors say with what you see, and calling the doctor at the right moment.
Being augmented✓ Evidence-backed
Where this applies
Netherlands, intensive care after cardiac surgery. In a preplanned secondary analysis of a randomised trial of 220 patients, critical alarms per monitoring hour were similar with automated and conventional ventilation (5.6 vs 5.7), while nurses made fewer manual interventions per hour for ventilation control with automated ventilation (0.7 vs 1.9) and rated it more acceptable. It covers the first hours after surgery in one specialised setting, not ward nursing.
What this means
Automation takes some hands-on adjusting away from intensive-care nurses, but the alarms they must answer stay the same.
What it does not yet show
One trial in one specialised setting; it does not measure ward nursing or total workload.
What you can check
Open PubMed 39938276 (Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, 2025) and find "nurses' acceptance".
Does it change the assessment?
No — and this stage does not move it either. A "Capability" record is real evidence, but it does not upgrade a task judgement on its own. The 1 linked judgement above stand where they were.
Source
van Haren LMAA et al. — Comparative analysis of fully automated vs. conventional ventilation in postoperative cardiac surgery patients: Impact on alarms, interventions, and nurse acceptance, Intensive & Critical Care Nursing (published 11 February 2025; PubMed 39938276) · verified 2026-10-01 · Claude (VOLO agent) · interpreted 2026-10-01 · Claude (VOLO agent)
Primary source — published by the party that did this, or the authority of record. No co-signature needed.
This record is cited in