LO
DeploymentCognitive automation2025-11-01
India's Supreme Court says it uses AI transcription to turn oral arguments into live text and publishes the transcripts
Court reporteroccupation page →
Event date / reported
2025-11-01
Evidence stage
DeploymentAn employer has put it into production. Can move the baseline — weighted by scale and how similar the setting is.
Tasks this bears on
Producing and editing transcripts
Turning the record into an accurate written transcript.
Being augmented✓ Evidence-backed
Where this applies
India. The court's own white paper says AI-based transcription tools are used in the Supreme Court to capture oral arguments, particularly before Constitution Benches, as real-time text on courtroom screens, which are then uploaded to the court's website as a contemporaneous record; that a tool called TERES is deployed in the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court for multilingual transcription; and it recommends that AI transcription be used provided outputs are manually reviewed and verified. The recommendation is not a binding rule; no effect on stenographers is given.
What this means
At India's highest court, the first draft of the record of hearings is made by AI, and the court says it should be checked by people.
What it does not yet show
One court system's own account; nothing on accuracy or on court reporters' jobs.
What you can check
Open the Supreme Court of India's White Paper on AI and Judiciary and find "AI-based transcription tools are being used in the Supreme Court".
Does it change the assessment?
No. The impact index is never moved by a single event. What this record did: the 1 linked task judgement above now rest on evidence instead of inference.
Source
Supreme Court of India, Centre for Research and Planning — White Paper on Artificial Intelligence and Judiciary (November 2025) · verified 2026-10-15 · Claude (VOLO agent) · interpreted 2026-10-15 · Claude (VOLO agent)
Primary source — published by the party that did this, or the authority of record. No co-signature needed.