LO
ConstraintProcess & self-service2024-08-01
The EU AI Act classes AI that allocates tasks by individual behaviour or monitors and evaluates workers' performance as high-risk (Annex III 4(b)); the obligations apply from 2 December 2027
First-line manager / team supervisoroccupation page →
Event date / reported
2024-08-01 · reported 2026-07-27
Evidence stage
ConstraintFailure, rollback, regulation or cost is suppressing adoption. Can lower an assessment or widen its uncertainty.
Tasks this bears on
Deciding who does what today
Matching people to shifts, jobs and queues — who is free, who is fast at this, who is owed a better week — and reshuffling the whole thing when someone calls in sick.
Automating✓ Evidence-backed
Writing the review and giving the feedback
Assembling half a year of someone's work into an assessment, saying it to their face, and defending it when it decides their pay.
Automating✓ Evidence-backed
Where this applies
The European Union. The clause names exactly two things this job does every day: allocating tasks based on individual behaviour, personal traits or characteristics, and monitoring and evaluating the performance and behaviour of people in work relationships. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (the Digital Omnibus on AI, published 24 July 2026) moved the application of these obligations from 2 August 2026 to 2 December 2027 for systems that are high-risk under Annex III, and to 2 August 2028 for those that are high-risk under Article 6(1) and Annex I; so this is a rule on the books that does not yet apply. High-risk is not prohibition: it brings obligations — risk management, data governance, logging, transparency, human oversight — and this record cites the classification itself, not the detail of that obligation set. It does not say any employer has been penalised under it, and says nothing about jurisdictions outside the EU.
What this means
When EU legislators drew up the high-risk list, task allocation and performance evaluation were named separately: regulators treat machines doing these two things as consequential enough to legislate for. For a supervisor it turns how the system decided from an internal management question into one with statutory obligations attached — once they apply, from December 2027, after the EU postponed them.
What it does not yet show
High-risk is not prohibition, and the obligations do not yet apply: the EU pushed them back to December 2027, and they could move again. Nothing here shows any workplace changing practice. The EU only.
What you can check
Open EUR-Lex's consolidated text of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (version of 27 July 2026), find Annex III point 4(b), then Article 113, point (c) "shall apply from: (i) 2 December 2027".
Does it change the assessment?
No. The impact index is never moved by a single event. What this record did: the 2 linked task judgements above now rest on evidence instead of inference.
Source
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act), Annex III point 4(b) and Article 113, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 — EUR-Lex consolidated text of 27 July 2026 · verified 2026-09-27 · Claude (VOLO agent) · interpreted 2026-09-27 · Claude (VOLO agent)
Primary source — published by the party that did this, or the authority of record. No co-signature needed.
This record is cited in